Sabarimala
Judgement of the Hon’ble SC and the surrounding complexities
The aftermath of the Supreme Court decision in the
Sabarimala case is essentially concerning if not unnerving.
Faith is something that cannot be questioned or
dissected. There is strong resentment
and disenchantment among the devotees with regard to the Supreme Court
judgement. Thousands of devotees, most
among them also being women, are spearheading protests all over Kerala and
outside opposing the above judgement.
The age old customs and religious rituals being judiciously
followed by the devotees have now come up for questioning from the
constitutional view of fundamental rights and equality.
The Gordian knot is the conflict between age old religious
practice and faith and the inconsistent constitutional protection under
Articles 25 and 26.
It is a very serious but a sensitive one, too.
Kerala, which is always at the forefront as a role model
state for the highest literacy rating, is now caught in a whirlwind of
increasing unrest and confusion which appears to shake its very
foundation. There is also the danger of
this unrest spilling into other states where there are Sabarimala devotees in
large numbers.
This is a situation of an uncompromising divide between
deeply hurt religious sentiments and an analytically perfect Court order.
The Government of Kerala is not helping to resolve the
conflict in any way by its attempt at strict action against devotees and
demonstrators.
No doubt the Supreme Court judgement is the outcome of
detailed analysis and interpretation of previous judgements. In this context, the lone dissenting order of
the woman judge gains significance indicating that there is more than one side
to a coin.
The Supreme Court’s Order is looked upon as final only because
we firmly believe that it is incapable of being wrong. There is no place for any mistake or
misstatement since so much study, analysis and discussion has gone into the
making of the historic order.
However, there is some truth in what Shri Ashok Kumar Bal,
a retired Civil Servant opines. He says
“the Court may not be the appropriate forum to resolve such sensitive issues or
disputes. They cannot also assume the role of a theological guide or
adjudicator on such issues”.
As an aftermath of the judgement, countless petitions have
now been filed before the Supreme Court.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court is looked upon with great respect
and reverence from time immemorial. It was firmly believed that the Indian
judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, is incapable of hasty or shaky
judgments.
While reviewing these petitions, it was sincerely and
fervently hoped that the Supreme Court will pull off a victory by issuing a
studied judicious order that balances equally well both time tested religious
sentiments and fundamental rights.
In matters of religious faith, belief, customs and rituals
have existed for centuries without any harm being rendered to the society and
they also have the stamp of the widest acceptance of the people at large.
It needs to be seen that at times, law or logic may not
necessarily be the tool to resolve a dispute.
It is the intelligent step of helping faith and law mutually coexist
that is expected of the Judiciary.
The clever knack of making both appear equally represented is
what the public looks for in a judicial decision. But, it is also true that it is this same
faith that made the law to stand for it all this while.
Now,
the honourable Supreme Court has come out with a considered judgement ordering
the Kerala Government to frame a separate law for the management of the
Sabarimala Temple by the third week of January 2020. It also referred the Sabarimala issue to a larger,
seven-member bench after hearing pleas seeking a review of its decision to
allow women of all ages into the temple. In September last year, the court held
that a centuries-old ban on women and girls aged 10 to 50 was illegal and
constitutional. But protesters thwarted most attempts by women to travel to the
Sabarimala temple, located northeast of Pathanamthitta in a tiger reserve.
This
judgement I sincerely hope will put to rest all unrest and confusion.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBest wishes.
ReplyDelete//..This judgement I sincerely hope will put to rest all unrest and confusion.//
ReplyDeleteNo. It won't. It will end up only in fanning the fire.. which will immensely help the vested interests in the long run.
The issue at hand is more complex by nature for the insipid government to intrude in the pretext of sorting things out.
Ekanthan Sir, please read my article on CAA uploaded yesterday and revert with your observations.
Delete